Ours after its appearance of what whatsapp pursued the Government of Indian on new digital rules, the Minister of Ravi Shankar Prasad, do not punch on the mail platform and, among others, accused him of ‘Avoid responsibility and being “misplaced”.
The sensational attack without any forbidden attack on WhatsApp of the IT Ministry clearly indicates that the Indian government sees WhatsApp by moving the Court as an act of unacceptable challenge.
And as such, the imbroglio between the two does not seem to go to closing earlier, especially after the government stated that the United Nations on the search for a solution to the question of traceability is WhatsApp .
WhatsApp’s problems in India continues – his case is thrown by court
What should you do if you get a link for WhatsApp in pink?
Concerned about your privacy of WhatsApp? Here are the best alternatives
India respects the right to privacy: Minister
The IT Minister, while asking for the challenge of WhatsApp to the new intermediate guidelines as an “unhappy attempt” to prevent them from entering into force, indicated that “no fundamental right, including the right to privacy, is absolute and submitted to reasonable restrictions “.
“The requirements of the interim guidelines for the first information initiator are such a reasonable example of restriction,” said the government.
On the affirmation of WhatsApp that the obligation to provide access to encrypted messages will perfect confidentiality protections, the Government of India stated: “These requirements are only if a particular message is required for prevention, investigation or The sanction of serious offenses such as sexually explicit content. “
He pointed out that he respected the right to privacy and had no intention of violating it while seeking details about the lovers of some messages.
However, he also added that, in accordance with all established judicial sayings, “no fundamental right, including the right to privacy, is absolute and is subject to reasonable restrictions. The requirements in the intermediate guidelines for the first information initiator are an example of such a reasonable restriction. “
The Minister of the Union also clarified that none of the measures proposed by India will have no impact on the normal functioning of WhatsApp in any way and for common users, there will be no impact.
“According to the intermediate guidelines, the information sender can only be traced in a scenario where other remedies have been ineffective, which makes the same measure of the last journal. In addition, this information can not be sought. that in accordance with a process sanctioned by law thus incorporating sufficient legal guarantees. “
WhatsApp’s “Double Standards”
Even clearly stating the position of India, the IT minister let lost a strong attack on WhatsApp, accusing it virtually of double standards.
“As an intermediary social media, WhatsApp is looking for a safe port protection in accordance with the provisions of the Information Technology Act. However, in a perfunition law, they seek to avoid responsibilities and refuse to promulgate the very measures that allow them a safe port provision, “the minister said.
The government has also resulted in WhatsApp’s new privacy policy.
“At one end, WhatsApp seeks to mandate a privacy policy in which it will share the data of all its users with its parent company, Facebook, for marketing and advertising purposes. On the other hand, WhatsApp makes every effort to refuse the Promulgation of the promotion of the interim guidelines needed to defend the law and order and curb the threat of false news. “
“WhatsApp defends its refusal to promulgate the intermediate guidelines by sculpting an exception that the messages on the platform are completed at the end of the encrypted part.”
It is relevant to note that the rule to trace the first information initiator is mandatory for each intermediary of significant social media, regardless of their operating method, added.
